Please note: you are viewing an old version of this deal. The current version can be found here: Deal #4757

Deal #4757 Version #69284

Tanzania
Created at
2015-09-01
Last update
2020-03-02
Last full update
2023-03-10

Names of communities / indigenous peoples affected

Name of community
Lipokela village

Recognition status of community land tenure

Recognition status of community land tenure
Community traditional or customary rights recognized by government

Consultation of local community

Community consultation
Not consulted
Comment on consultation of local community
Community members in Lipokela village were not consulted (only elders of the village were consulted).

How did the community react?

Community reaction
Rejection
Comment on community reaction
Community members of Lipokela unanimously agreed that land was granted without their consent. Residents of Lipokela have attempted to file complaints and raise concerns about the investment. Some residents stated that they visited their district council to verify how much tax Olam-Aviv is paying and report that they were turned away and told to go back to their Village Council. Additionally, when national leaders visited the Olam-Aviv plantation, residents state that they were not allowed to speak out or ask questions.

Presence of land conflicts

Presence of land conflicts
Yes
Comment on presence of land conflicts
Residents of Lipokela have attempted to file complaints and raise concerns about the investment. Some residents stated that they visited their district council to verify how much tax Olam-Aviv is paying and report that they were turned away and told to go back to their Village Council. Additionally, when national leaders visited the Olam-Aviv plantation, residents state that they were not allowed to speak out or ask questions.

Displacement of people

Displacement of people
Yes
Comment on displacement of people
Various villages- several families do not cultivate any land due to a shortage of land and/or soil fertility issues

Negative impacts for local communities

Negative impacts for local communities
Displacement

Promised or received compensation

Received compensation (e.g. for damages or resettlements)
"Compensation was low". "I received $180 for my 14 acres". Company states that 113 people have been resettled and compensated.

Promised benefits for local communities

Promised benefits for local communities
Health, Education, Financial support
Comment on promised benefits for local communities
Development of roads and energy services in the Songea Region. The company has allocated US$3,000 per village per year to spend on community projects. Liganga has elected to provide solar lighting for its school while Lusonga purchased desks. A dispensary in Lipokela is being built.

Materialized benefits for local communities

Materialized benefits for local communities
Health, Education
Comment on materialized benefits for local communities
The company has allocated US$3,000 per village per year to spend on community projects. Liganga has elected to provide solar lighting for its school while Lusonga purchased desks. A dispensary in Lipokela is being built.