Please note: you are viewing an old version of this deal. The current version can be found here: Deal #4603
Deal #4603 Version #68616
Gabon
Created at
2015-03-03
Last update
2021-04-27
Last full update
2021-04-26
Names of communities / indigenous peoples affected
Name of community
Ndendé community
Consultation of local community
Community consultation
Limited consultation
Comment on consultation of local community
Some villagers claim that they were not consulted.
How did the community react?
Community reaction
Rejection
Comment on community reaction
Some villagers reject the project.
The communities addressed the petition to the administrative authorities with the help of a local organisation and an international civil society network against the expansion of monocultures, particularly oil palm.
Presence of land conflicts
Presence of land conflicts
Yes
Comment on presence of land conflicts
Communities had lost a large part of their land, about 18,000 hectares, so they demanded, through a petition supported by other national and international organisations in September 2019.
Negative impacts for local communities
Negative impacts for local communities
Environmental degradation, Socio-economic, Cultural loss, Eviction
Comment on negative impacts for local communities
The communities feel alienated in their own territories as Olam has been asking for several years that people get a permit issued by the company in order to enter the concessions. Many villagers complain that they still do not have this permit and therefore cannot access their own territory and those who do obtain a permit complain that they can no longer continue their activities on their territory during Olam's working
hours (between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m.), including not being able to fish in the few remaining lakes.
Other negative impacts mentioned by African peoples Tribunal:-
- The destruction of areas where villagers used to harvest foodstuffs such as fruits and medicinal plants;
- A profound ecological imbalance, including the fragmentation of wildlife habitats and the destruction of
water points; this has created a huge problem with elephants and other animals regularly roaming the
communities in search of food; villagers have also observed a significant increase in the population of
flies, as well as other insects and reptiles, including snakes;
- The destruction of fertile fields for food production in forests and savannahs that are now covered with
monoculture oil palm;
- The use of chemicals, fertilisers and pesticides on plantations, which contaminate the region's soils, rivers
and lakes;
- The water needs of the plantations - this situation has been aggravated by the irrigation program planned
by Olam to ensure year-round water availability for the plantation areas, exposing the communities to an
even greater risk of water scarcity.
Promised benefits for local communities
Promised benefits for local communities
Health, Productive infrastructure (e.g. irrigation, tractors, machinery...), Roads, Capacity building, Financial support
Comment on promised benefits for local communities
Participants will receive public healthcare coverage, access to low-interest loans
Presence of organizations and actions taken (e.g. farmer organizations, NGOs, etc.)
Presence of organizations and actions taken (e.g. farmer organizations, NGOs, etc.)
The communities of Nanga and Ferra villages launched a petition in September 2019 in which they asked
Sotrader/Olam to stop planting on a part of the concession still undeveloped because of the negative consequences already observed on the planted areas. A march was organised in the commune of Ndendé and the petition was officially handed over to the prefect of the locality where Sotrader has its headquarters in the province. This petition was launched with the support of the NGO Muyissi Environnement and the International Alliance on Monocultures supported by organisations such as GRAIN, WRM, RADD and SEFE. Rainforest Rescue also launched the petition at the international level.