Please note: you are viewing an old version of this deal. The current version can be found here: Deal #3891

Deal #3891 Version #64507

Colombia
Created at
2013-07-05
Last update
2019-06-28
Last full update
2023-08-22

Names of communities / indigenous peoples affected

Name of indigenous people
Sáliba,
Piapoco
Comment on communities / indigenous peoples affected
Information obtained by comparing the official map of Indigenous communities of Colombia and the properties of Riopaila Castilla

Recognition status of community land tenure

Recognition status of community land tenure
Community traditional or customary rights recognized by government
Comment on recognition status of community land tenure
The communities have some land rights recognized under indigenous reserves.

Consultation of local community

Community consultation
Not consulted
Comment on consultation of local community
The company complied with Colombian law regarding the previous consultation required in case of presence of ethnic or minority groups once a project is to be developed. Given that the influence area of the company do not collide with the indigenous reserves of the previously mentioned ethnic groups, the company is not obliged to make any previous consultation. This happens, although the properties of the company might be just 112 meters away from the indigenous territories. Source 15.

How did the community react?

Community reaction
Mixed reaction
Comment on community reaction
It seems that the municipal administrators are in favor of the project, nevertheless, these testimonies were obtained from company resources. The public opinion in Colombia is highly divided around this project, since the way the company acquired the land was clearly a legal artifact. Some argue it was illegal.

Presence of land conflicts

Presence of land conflicts
Yes
Comment on presence of land conflicts
Some of the properties were legalized or registered in the notaries 20th of Cali and 4th of Villavicencio, which was being investigated by one of the registry offices of Colombia for committing fraud on land that previously belonged to paramilitary groups or businessmen linked to them. It is not clear whether those land had a past linked with the Colombian conflict. Notwithstanding this matter, it is certain that the company used a legal artifact to be the owner of the land, circumventing law 160 of 1994, which impedes irregular land accumulation. Source 5

Displacement of people

Displacement of people
No

Materialized benefits for local communities

Materialized benefits for local communities
Other
Comment on materialized benefits for local communities
Trainings, technical assistance