Deal #3502

Cambodia
Created at
2013-04-03
Last update
2021-01-27
Last full update
2021-01-27

Consultation of local community

Community consultation
Not consulted
Comment on consultation of local community
consultation only after contract had been signed

How did the community react?

Community reaction
Rejection
Comment on community reaction
company is accused of illegal logging

Promised or received compensation

Promised compensation (e.g. for damages or resettlements)
“compensation was only paid for the loss of resin trees in Srae Chang and Krasang, but not in Pum Chas which was hit the severest. A reason why villagers from Pum Chas didn’t get compensated at all might be the village’s unregistered and therefore illegal status, making its villagers more vulnerable to eviction and less powerful during negotiation processes … In Srae Chang, affected villagers received compensations of 5,000 riel per tree, whereas in Krasang the amount varied between 5,000 and 10,000 riel … None of the consulted villagers were satisfied with the compensation. They objected the low amount per tree, as well as the fact that the company didn’t pay compensation for the loss of land” (Michel Thesis, p. 106 f.)

Promised benefits for local communities

Promised benefits for local communities
Productive infrastructure (e.g. irrigation, tractors, machinery...)