Comparing deal #3461 @61317

Deal #3461	Version 61317	Version 88074
General info
Land area
Intention of investment
Carbon offset project
Nature of the deal
Negotiation status
Implementation status
Purchase price
Leasing fees
Contract farming
Employment
Number of total jobs created
Number of jobs for foreigners created
Number of domestic jobs created
Investor info
Operating company
Local communities / indigenous peoples
Names of communities / indigenous peoples affected
Recognition status of community land tenure
Consultation of local community
How did the community react?
Presence of land conflicts
Displacement of people
Negative impacts for local communities
Promised or received compensation
Promised benefits for local communities
Materialized benefits for local communities
Presence of organizations and actions taken (e.g. farmer organizations, NGOs, etc.)
Former use
Former land owner (not by constitution)
Former land use
Former land cover
Produce info
Detailed crop, animal and mineral information
Detailed contract farming crop and animal information
Detailed electricity generation information
Detailed carbon sequestration/offsetting information
Use of produce
In country processing of produce
Water
Water extraction envisaged
Source of water extraction
How much do investors pay for water and the use of water infrastructure?
How much water is extracted?
Gender-related info
Any gender-specific information about the investment and its impacts
Overall comment
Overall comment
Meta
Fully updated
Fully updated	No	Yes
Confidential
Locations
Data sources
Data source #0KJhdF1Q
Url	www.reuters.com
Comment on data source	Profile EPO shareholders	Profile EPO shareholders The URL is no longer working: http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/companyProfile?symbol=PALO.L
Data source #gW3Yxv--
Url	www.epoil.co.uk
Publication title		Equatorial Palm Oil plc Liberia Rising
Organisation		Hardman & Co
Comment on data source	Hardman analysis	The URL no longer working: http://www.epoil.co.uk/uploads/epoinitiationfeb2012.pdf
Data source #Db5yXka7
Publication title		The global farmland grab in 2016: how big, how bad?
Date		2016
Organisation		Grain
Comment on data source	Grain- The global farmland grab in 2016: how big, how bad?
Contracts

General info

Land area

Intention of investment

Carbon offset project

Nature of the deal

Negotiation status

Implementation status

Purchase price

Leasing fees

Contract farming

Employment

Number of total jobs created

Number of jobs for foreigners created

Number of domestic jobs created

Investor info

Operating company

Local communities / indigenous peoples

Names of communities / indigenous peoples affected

Recognition status of community land tenure

Consultation of local community

How did the community react?

Presence of land conflicts

Displacement of people

Negative impacts for local communities

Promised or received compensation

Promised benefits for local communities

Materialized benefits for local communities

Presence of organizations and actions taken (e.g. farmer organizations, NGOs, etc.)

Former use

Former land owner (not by constitution)

Former land use

Former land cover

Produce info

Detailed crop, animal and mineral information

Detailed contract farming crop and animal information

Detailed electricity generation information

Detailed carbon sequestration/offsetting information

Use of produce

In country processing of produce

Water

Water extraction envisaged

Source of water extraction

How much do investors pay for water and the use of water infrastructure?

How much water is extracted?

Gender-related info

Any gender-specific information about the investment and its impacts

Overall comment

Overall comment

Meta

Fully updated

Confidential

Locations

Data sources

Data source #0KJhdF1Q

Data source #gW3Yxv--

Data source #Db5yXka7

Contracts