Please note: you are viewing an old version of this deal. The current version can be found here: Deal #1999

Deal #1999 Version #56553

Congo, Dem. Rep.
Created at
2013-02-15
Last update
2016-11-25
Last full update
2024-03-04

Consultation of local community

Community consultation
Not consulted
Comment on consultation of local community
Community leaders say the land was taken from them illegally and that they never gave their consent for Feronia to operate there and did not agree to the negotiated terms. Community members wish to start the negotiation phase with the company. On March 8, 2015, over 60 customary chiefs and other community leaders gathered in the town of Mozité to call for the resolution of their longstanding grievances against Feronia.

How did the community react?

Community reaction
Rejection
Comment on community reaction
The local community state that the land was illegally taken from them and reject the project. The communities claim that the title deeds for the land are falsified to represent Feronia as the legal owners. One report states that the community suffer from intimidation from the police if they protest against the project. The company response to intimidation is that the company has a whistleblower policy in place and is developing a community grievance mechanism. The community is fighting back, claiming their lands back. In October2015, 12 leaders from communities affected by the plantations met in Kampala to discuss actions which can be taken in order to get their land back. NGO's and civil society organizations were also at the meeting. The leaders established a new alliance of communities affected by Feronia.

Displacement of people

Number of people actually displaced
45 000
Comment on displacement of people
The company prevents local people from raising livestock or farming within the company's concession, even on lands that the company has abandoned. Community members caught by company guards carrying just a few nuts fallen from the oil palms are fined or, in many cases, whipped, hand cuffed and taken to the nearest prison. One report states that the number of displaced villagers are 45000. communities located within. Communities affected by the plantations include: Yahuma, Boteka, Basoko, Yaligimba, Yalifombo,Mosité, Lokutu.

Promised or received compensation

Promised compensation (e.g. for damages or resettlements)
No compensation has been paid to date (2015). Communities are demanding that compensation occurs. Unilever originally promised to hand one plantation out of every three back to the community.

Promised benefits for local communities

Promised benefits for local communities
Health, Education, Productive infrastructure (e.g. irrigation, tractors, machinery...), Roads
Comment on promised benefits for local communities
Feronia announced at the end of 2014 that it wanted to "engage with local communities in the development of new facilities meet their daily needs". To date the communities have not seen any of the stated benefits. US$3.6m has been ring-fenced to support the company to strengthen business standards and enhance community facilities -- this includes: refurbishment of the housing and sanitation available to workers; a road maintenance program to update the infrastructure on Feronia land that all local people can use; appointing new health & safety staff and community relations managers; undertaking a comprehensive study of the needs of workers and the local community; a new grievance procedure for workers and community; and land mapping to clearly mark out where the company's land extends. Community homes, schools, clinics and roads are in awful condition, and contrary to what Feronia maintains, no newinfrastructureorworker homes havebeen built.