Deal #1976 Version #86549

The company states " Prior to project commencement, there was extensive consultation with the affected communities, including public hearings. The project was initiated with support from the communities and local and district leadership". The company states that the government was responsible for acquisition of the land for the project, and that FPIC was obtained from the community members. Other data sources states that no consultation occurred.

Community outcries for the project to be reformed or shut-down have been ignored. Affected communities are demanding the return of land improperly taken, guarantees for the protection of community land rights, compensation for crop damage, and long term protection of community forests, water, and other natural resources. On 19 February 2015, a group of farmers filed a lawsuit against Bidco Uganda and Amos Ssempa, who leased the land to Opul. Wilmar states that the project was initiated with the support of communities and local leadership.

Many conflicts between the communities and the Project arising from denied access to: – Use of the project road network for livestock movements/transportation; – Water points located in the project area formerly used by the communities; some were destroyed during the clearing of land for project activities; – Grazing lands within the project area leading to confiscation of “trespassing” animals with either an exorbitant fine of about 50,000 Shs (Ugandan shillings) per animal, or risk of having the animals slaughtered and eaten free of charge, which discourages animal rearing in most areas of the project.

Some sources state that displacement did not occur, while others state displacement occurred. One report states that thousands of community members have been displaced. 5,442 PAPs (Project Affected Persons)- 7,591 hectares have been secured. The company states that the Government was responsible for obtaining land for the project, and the company or other investors were not involved. The company further states that the land was on willing seller, willing buyer basis, and no compulsory acquisition took place. Land transactions were signed between owners and government, however the tenants were not informed- around 100 small scale farmers and their families. One reports states that in 2018, 36 of the 38 farmers displaced for Bidco project were compensated after World Bank mediation.

The report also claims the communities suffer from degraded water sources. Three EIA were conducted. Some reports state that the project has caused food insecurity. Another recent report (2019) has found that "Contrary to the portrayal by some activists who blame the palm oil plantation for deteriorating living conditions of islanders, poor living conditions and food insecurity were the norm for the islanders long before the plantation was established.". local communities living on both private and public land have lost their livelihood.

Some of the displaced received new land. Some reports suggest that the community received inadequate compensation (ranging from Shs 100 000 to 1.5million) for their land and that international norms and national laws were broken. Another report states that the squatters were offered between $35 and $200. Total compensation paid as at Feb 2018 is Shs67 billion.

infrastructure – such as electric power, roads, ferries and medical facilities

infrastructure – such as electric power, roads, ferries and medical facilities. Santiago 2019 states that food security is better now with the project than before the project.

On 19 February 2015, three Ugandan farmers from Lake Victoria’s Bugula Island, Kalagala District, backed by the National Association of Professional Environmentalists (NAPE) and Friends of the Earth, brought a lawsuit on behalf of their community against Oil Palm Uganda before the courts of Masaka, Uganda, over alleged land grabs.