Deal #1474

Mali
Created at
2013-02-15
Last update
2024-05-03
Last full update
2024-05-03

Consultation of local community

Community consultation
Not consulted
Comment on consultation of local community
There was a general lack of clear information for the affected villagers.

How did the community react?

Community reaction
Rejection
Comment on community reaction
Anger among locals against Malibya is high. The farmers unions (Syndicat des exploitants de l’Office du Niger (SEXAGON)) want members to be included in the project. Farmers originally thought that the project would give them access to irrigated land. Prostests occured when they realised that this was not the case.

Displacement of people

Number of people actually displaced
60 000
Comment on displacement of people
Several communities live inside the concession area, and some families have been farming on the land for over 800 years. Some farmers lost productive land due to the construction of the canal.Around 150 households had to relocate as a result of the canal.

Negative impacts for local communities

Negative impacts for local communities
Cultural loss
Comment on negative impacts for local communities
Bulldozers had accidentally dug-up bodies from the Muslim and Christian graveyards. The community were unable to determine which bodies were Muslim and Christian for re-burial.

Promised or received compensation

Promised compensation (e.g. for damages or resettlements)
Only 57 out of 150 affected families are compensated however according to GTZ report no compensation.
Received compensation (e.g. for damages or resettlements)
Only 57 out of 150 affected families are compensated however according to GTZ report no compensation.

Promised benefits for local communities

Promised benefits for local communities
Productive infrastructure (e.g. irrigation, tractors, machinery...)
Comment on promised benefits for local communities
The condition was that the investors provide productive infrastructure, however no infrastructure as been built as of May 2015.

Materialized benefits for local communities

Comment on materialized benefits for local communities
The condition was that the investors provide productive infrastructure, however no infrastructure as been built as of May 2015.