Please note: you are viewing an old version of this deal. The current version can be found here: Deal #1151

Deal #1151 Version #51490

Cameroon
Created at
2013-02-15
Last update
2020-05-26
Last full update
2024-04-08

Names of communities / indigenous peoples affected

Name of community
Dibombari, Mbongo, Mbambou, Eséka, Edéa and Kienké communities

Consultation of local community

Community consultation
Limited consultation
Comment on consultation of local community
No consultation with the forest-dwelling Bagyeli people

How did the community react?

Community reaction
Rejection
Comment on community reaction
On June 1, 2016, hundreds of community members peacefully mobilized to disrupt Socapalm and Safacam's activities in five plantations (Mbambou, Mbongo, Dibombari, safacam, Kienké) and to challenge the company administration.

Presence of land conflicts

Presence of land conflicts
Yes
Comment on presence of land conflicts
Land acquisition conflicts Plantation conflicts (incl. Pulp Deforestation) Agro-fuels and biomass energy plants (Agro-toxics)

Negative impacts for local communities

Negative impacts for local communities
Environmental degradation, Socio-economic, Cultural loss, Other
Comment on negative impacts for local communities
Traditional authorities of Mbonjo, a village located in Moungo division of the Littoral region accuse SOCAPALM (Société Camerounaise de Palmeraies) of defiling their cultural heritage and landgrabbing. Mbonjo Community is a typical agricultural setting that depends on subsidence economy for survival and can no longer survive because not only have their land be expropriated but they have been denied their source of survival. The group has also been accused of water pollution and inequitable distribution of wealth. For instance, the agrochemicals used in the monocultures and the residues of its Kienké processing plant have massively polluted nearby rivers.

Promised or received compensation

Promised compensation (e.g. for damages or resettlements)
In 2013, an action plan was signed between Bolloré Group and some ten NGOs defending the rights of communities on the issue of palm oil production in Cameroon. It was intended to improve the living conditions of residents and workers of SOCAPALM.
Received compensation (e.g. for damages or resettlements)
However, the Bolloré Group is accused of never having respected its commitments. The workers of SOCAPALM are disgruntled because after several hours of work they are paid only 650 FCFA daily.

Promised benefits for local communities

Promised benefits for local communities
Education, Other
Comment on promised benefits for local communities
Water Wells

Materialized benefits for local communities

Materialized benefits for local communities
Health, Education, Roads, Other
Comment on materialized benefits for local communities
According to the company sources neigbouring communities have access to free education for their children in schools built by Socapalm and also have free access to Socapalm’s medical services. Socapalm provides several villages with electrical connections of medium and low voltage; several drinking water units are also installed in the villages, as well as boreholes and wells for which Socapalm ensures repair and maintenance.Furthermore, Socapalm ensures the excavation and re-profiling of roads, construction and maintenance of bridges connecting the villages to each other and to the urban centers.

Presence of organizations and actions taken (e.g. farmer organizations, NGOs, etc.)

Presence of organizations and actions taken (e.g. farmer organizations, NGOs, etc.)
In 2013, an action plan was signed between Bolloré Group and some ten NGOs defending the rights of communities on the issue of palm oil production in Cameroon. It was intended to improve the living conditions of residents and workers of SOCAPALM. Local producers have been staging strike actions against the company, which they accuse of failing to respect terms of the agreement.