Deal #543

Vietnam
Created at
2013-02-15
Last update
2022-03-17
Last full update
2022-03-17

How did the community react?

Community reaction
Mixed reaction
Comment on community reaction
*The community around Tan Mai is both physically and emotionally divided. One group of families lives next to the factory's back wall, collecting the paper fibers, another group grows rice in fields nearby, a third group lives in company-built apartments on the urban side of the factory, and a fourth lives in fish-raising houseboats on the river into which Tan Mai discharges its wastewater.

Presence of land conflicts

Presence of land conflicts
Yes
Comment on presence of land conflicts
*The firm has strong linkages with the state that no amount of local pressure can motivate stricter regulation on environmental standards. Recognizing this, community members have given up even submitting formal complaint letters

Negative impacts for local communities

Negative impacts for local communities
Environmental degradation
Comment on negative impacts for local communities
*Pollution: black liquor, boiler gases, fibers, dust, BOD, COD Community members complain of nausea from air pollution, undrinkable wellwater, nose, eye, and skin problems, and lower yields from their fruit trees. Impacts people in Quang Ngai in particular: "The lives of many households face many difficulties," said Ho Van Thai, Chairman of Binh Long Commune People's Committee, adding that the land of more than 200 households was handed over to the project, but the factory "stands still". , became a fallow land, the people could not cultivate, the small construction items in the project land were degraded. See: https://baodautu.vn/cuoc-chia-tay-tri-gia-2000-ty-dong-cua-tap-doan-tan-mai-tai-quang-ngai-d82040.html See:

Promised or received compensation

Promised compensation (e.g. for damages or resettlements)
*Between 1992 and 1996, community members wrote letters to the DOSTE, the media, and to the factory management. The DOSTE investigated the claims of the community, but never showed the results to community members, and never awarded compensation for lost crops or fish.