Deal #1680
Nigeria
Created at
2013-02-15
Last update
2024-08-05
Last full update
2024-08-05
Names of communities / indigenous peoples affected
Name of community
Elele Alimini
Recognition status of community land tenure
Recognition status of community land tenure
Indigenous Peoples traditional or customary rights not recognized by government
Comment on recognition status of community land tenure
The government has been criticised for improperly using the Land Use Act to seize peoples' land by force, despite the fact that the Act states that the government is allowed to take any portion of land for the "public interest" and not to seize the land and give it to a private company to profit from. He calls for the amendment of the Land Use Ac
Consultation of local community
Community consultation
Limited consultation
How did the community react?
Community reaction
Mixed reaction
Presence of land conflicts
Presence of land conflicts
Yes
Comment on presence of land conflicts
SIAT Nigeria is accused of land grabbing-A 5-month investigation by Elfredah Kevin-Alerechi and Kevin Woke revealed how SIAT Nigeria Limited is grabbing host communities' lands and paying them only six hundred Naira (N600) per hectare annually.
Negative impacts for local communities
Negative impacts for local communities
Environmental degradation, Socio-economic
Comment on negative impacts for local communities
land grabbing and pollution is causing hardship in host communities
SIAT Nigeria Limited, has polluted the river with its fertilisers and chemicals used for weed and pest control.
Promised or received compensation
Received compensation (e.g. for damages or resettlements)
SIAT Nigeria Limited is grabbing host communities' lands and paying them only six hundred Naira (N600) per hectare annually.
This is three times less the amount of what land owners typically pay to neighbouring villages to buy a ridge of farmland for a farming season. The company's operations have contaminated the streams and rivers that serve as the majority's supply of drinking water.
Promised benefits for local communities
Promised benefits for local communities
Education, Productive infrastructure (e.g. irrigation, tractors, machinery...), Roads
Comment on promised benefits for local communities
SIAT has failed to uphold its CSR commitments despite promising to provide water, electricity, scholarships, and road building in its memorandum of understanding with host communities